942 results for 'cat:"Due Process"'.
J. Womack finds the circuit court properly denied the petition for habeas corpus. Defendant says that his rape conviction is illegal, claiming that there are inconsistencies in the judgment and commitment order as well as in the docket entries. The alleged inconsistences consist only of discrepancies in the offense date. Docket entries recorded by various court clerks have no bearing on the facial legality of a judgment or jurisdiction. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court, Judge: Womack , Filed On: May 9, 2024, Case #: CV-23-720, Categories: Habeas, Sex Offender, due Process
J. Virden finds the county court improperly denied the estate’s petition for a writ to revive a deficiency judgment obtained during foreclosure proceedings against debtors to the estate. The 10-year period for revival did not begin to run from the date of the initial foreclosure decree, but from that of the deficiency judgment. The decree did not dismiss the parties from the case or put the judgment into execution. Reversed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Virden , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CV-23-200, Categories: Debt Collection, due Process, Banking / Lending
J. Klappenbach finds the circuit court properly terminated the mother's parental rights to her two children. The 18- and 6-month-old children were taken into custody when the children’s putative father was arrested on drugs and weapons charges during the mother's period of incarceration on a different conviction. All evidence supports the best interest finding and the court committed no reversible error in denying the mother's motion to have witnesses testify remotely. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Klappenbach , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: CV-23-837, Categories: Family Law, due Process, Guardianship
J. Callins finds a lower court erred when it sustained a demurrer by county officials after they were sued by residents concerned about the approval of a major development by Amazon. The officials did not comply with requirements to give adequate public notice because the summary of their proposed action did not include relevant information, including a proposed increase “in the height and density limits for buildings.” Reversed.
Court: Virginia Court Of Appeals, Judge: Callins, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 0240-23-4, Categories: Government, due Process
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Samour finds the appeals court properly overturned the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment to the university on contract claims filed by the male student accused of rape. When read in conjunction with the entirety of the school's Office of Equal Opportunity procedures handbook, the requirement for a "thorough, impartial, and fair" investigation into allegations of sexual assault created a contractual relationship between the parties. Additionally, the male student's allegations the university failed to interview four of the five witnesses he presented and failed to seek out missing portions of the victim's medical examination file render his contract claim plausible and prevent judgment in favor of the university. Affirmed in part.
Court: Colorado Supreme Court, Judge: Samour, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 2024CO27, Categories: Education, due Process, Contract
J. Tharp grants Illinois’ motion to dismiss Volkswagen’s constitutional challenge to the Illinois Motor Vehicle Franchise Act, which makes it so independent auto dealerships operate independently of “legacy” auto manufacturers like Volkswagen, meaning Volkswagen can’t operate service centers in independent dealerships. But because new and pre-owned vehicles come with manufacturer warranties, Volkswagen still has to reimburse the independent dealerships for any repair and service work they do to their customers’ cars. Volkswagen claims a 2022 amendment to the Act meant to give auto repair workers greater compensation violates its free speech, due process and equal protection rights. But the court finds Volkswagen has failed to state an actionable claim for its due process and equal process claims, and lacks standing for its First Amendment allegations.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Tharp, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv7045, NOS: Constitutionality of State Statutes - Other Suits, Categories: Constitution, Vehicle, due Process
[Consolidated.] J. Thompson denies, in part, the attorney general’s motion to dismiss this lawsuit regarding the constitutionality of prosecuting anyone who assists in facilitating out-of-state abortions brought by an advocacy group, also on behalf of its clients, and a women’s center also on behalf of its staff. The group and center seek to prohibit the prosecution of those who assist pregnant women to obtain abortions where it is still legal in other states alleging it is a violation of the right to travel, freedom of speech, freedom of association, the right to fair-notice due process claims, and is overbroad. The attorney general cannot prevent people to travel to another state, “Alabama can no more restrict people from going to, say, California to engage in what is lawful there than California can restrict people from coming to Alabama to do what is lawful here.” Their overbreadth and the fair-notice due process claims are dismissed, but the advocates’ freedom of speech, right to travel, freedom of association and extraterritoriality claims survive the motion.
Court: USDC Middle District of Alabama, Judge: Thompson, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv450, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Constitution, Government, due Process
J. Clay finds that both the University of Michigan and its doctor, who controlled the lab from which the fentanyl used by the decedent was taken, are entitled to sovereign immunity on due process and wrongful death claims filed by the estate. It seeks only monetary damages, while the university has also not waived the defense, given its only motion in response to the lawsuit was the underlying motion to dismiss. Reversed.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: Clay, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 23-1718, Categories: Immunity, due Process, Wrongful Death
J. Lee denies in part a police officer's motion for summary judgment on claims including excessive force filed by a mother who was tripped to the ground, allegedly for resisting arrest, when visiting the courthouse to pick up her son. The mother gave sufficient evidence of her injuries to support the excessive force claim.
Court: USDC Southern District of Mississippi , Judge: Lee, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv439, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, due Process, Police Misconduct
J. Dorsey grants the emergency motion to stay the case. The investors paid $200,000 to the purchaser of IP addresses on his promise to flip and sell them for a profit. The loan was not repaid, and this claim and counterclaim ensued. An order was entered during discovery compelling an investor to produce medical records after he showed signs of mental incapacity at his deposition. The IP address purchaser now seeks a stay pending a determination as to whether the investor is incompetent to sue without proper representation. The district court is obligated to consider whether a potentially incapacitated litigant is adequately represented.
Court: USDC Nevada, Judge: Dorsey , Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv1809, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: due Process, Banking / Lending, Technology
J. Rodriguez denies a compounding pharmacy’s motion to dismiss for want of prosecution after it was sued under the False Claims Act for allegedly falsely inflating prices in bills to the federal government. The pharmacy argued that the U.S. has excessively extended its “intervention deadline” since the original complaint was filed in 2014, but the False Claims Act requires the government to “diligently ... investigate” claims made under the Act, and the delays — rather than reflecting “significant periods of total inactivity” — have instead reflected the government’s efforts to investigate other companies, which are necessary here “because all the defendants were alleged to have participated in the same scheme.”
Court: USDC Western District of Texas , Judge: Rodriguez, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 5:14cv212, NOS: Other Statutory Actions - Other Suits, Categories: Government, due Process, False Claims
J. Cradle finds the trial court did not violate the inmate's due process rights when it denied his motion for a continuance during his habeas trial. Although a crucial witness failed to appear, the inmate was able to present numerous exhibits and call other witnesses throughout the three day trial. Additionally, the absent witness had been served with multiple subpoenas and the trial court issued a capias in an attempt to force his appearance, and so there was no legitimate reason for a further delay. Affirmed.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Cradle, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: AC46237, Categories: Criminal Procedure, Habeas, due Process
J. Sellers finds the lower court properly granted an assistant district attorney's motion to dismiss claims of prosecutorial misconduct by an inmate who received a mistrial on a conviction of sexually assaulting a child but was convicted after a retrial. The relevant statute does not allow a prisoner to "use a rule of civil procedure to collaterally attack a criminal judgment." Affirmed.
Court: Alabama Supreme Court, Judge: Sellers, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: SC-2023-0945, Categories: Negligence, due Process, Jurisdiction
J. Wiseman finds the trial court properly vacated the default judgment. The judgment was entered against the at-fault driver in this auto collision suit after the owner of the damaged company vehicle accused her insurer, Allstate, of using a valuation that did not consider the pandemic's effect on fair market value and inflation. The petition to vacate was filed and the court found the at-fault driver was not in default when the judgment was entered, nor was she provided proper notice. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Wiseman , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 121053, Categories: Insurance, Vehicle, due Process
J. Wood partially grants the county administrator's, the county's, the ambulance service's and the 911 dispatchers' motions to dismiss a wrongful death and negligence action brought by a widow after her husband went into cardiac arrest and died from an anoxic brain injury. An ambulance did not arrive in response to the widow's 911 calls. The widow's state law claims against the county and other parties in their official capacities are barred by sovereign immunity. However, the widow's claim that the dispatchers deliberately lied in telling her an ambulance would arrive is enough to show an intent to cause harm and a violation of the husband's rights. The widow also sufficiently alleged a causal connection between the supervisors' conduct and the violation of the husband's rights.
Court: USDC Southern District of Georgia, Judge: Wood, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv27, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Negligence, due Process, Wrongful Death
J. Kemp finds the trial court properly convicted defendant for capital murder and aggravated robbery, sentencing him to life plus 40 years in prison. A homeowner called her husband about a suspicious person at the house and the husband, on his way home, found a body in the street with multiple gunshot wounds. Police dash cam recorded defendant escaping in the victim's truck, and the victim's DNA was discovered on defendant's bloody pants when he was later arrested on multiple warrants. Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Certain evidence was properly admitted as cumulative of other evidence admitted at trial, and Ring camera photos of the truck were properly authenticated by detective testimony. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court, Judge: Kemp , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: CR-23-574, Categories: Evidence, Murder, due Process
J. Barrett denies the student's motion for a preliminary injunction, ruling the university provided him notice of the sexual assault allegations within a month of the victim's submission of her final report and did not rely on any absent witness testimony when it expelled him; therefore, no due process rights were violated during disciplinary proceedings and the student is not entitled to an injunction.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Barrett, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv284, NOS: Education - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Rights, Education, due Process
J. Winokur finds that the circuit court properly denied defendant a writ of mandamus seeking another parole interview and consideration of a reduced sentence for aggravated assault because the commission has discretion to decide when to hold parole interviews, and defendant did not have a legal right to an interview. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Winokur, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1D2023-0798, Categories: Parole, Assault, due Process
J. Ransom finds that the lower court properly convicted defendant on drug charges. The court was not required to appoint counsel to represent defendant at his initial appearance or bail hearing, because these are not critical stages of the prosecution. Further, defendant's claim regarding the denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence because detectives lacked jurisdiction to arrange drug buys outside city limits is not preserved for judicial review. Affirmed.
Court: Missouri Supreme Court, Judge: Ransom, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: SC100170, Categories: Drug Offender, Ineffective Assistance, due Process
Per curiam, the Vermont Supreme Court finds that the lower court properly held the defendant without bond pending trial for sexual assault without consent. Defendant’s confession that he did try to penetrate his live-in girlfriend’s anus and her sworn statements were enough evidence to hold him without bond. He argues that his due process was violated when the weight of the evidence hearing was delayed, but he did not preserve that objection for review. Affirmed.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 24-AP-098, Categories: Sex Offender, Bail, due Process
[Consolidated.] J. LaGrua finds that the trial court improperly denied defendants' general demurrers to the indictment charging them with violating their oaths of office as police officers by failing to conduct investigations of other officers. One defendant is the former police chief of Glynn County and the other is the ex-police chief's chief of staff. The facts alleged in the indictments do not support the charge. Defendants' alleged failures to investigate are not violations of the law. Defendants could admit to the facts alleged in the indictment and still be innocent of the crimes alleged by the state. Reversed.
Court: Georgia Supreme Court, Judge: LaGrua, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: S24A0239, Categories: due Process
J. Hagedorn finds the circuit court and court of appeals properly upheld the police oversight board's decision affirming the chief of police's decision to fire the officer after an internal investigation into Facebook posts the officer made in the days and months after the 2018 arrest of Milwaukee Bucks player Sterling Brown, posts which the chief described as "inappropriate, disrespectful and defamatory." The officer's procedural challenges to his termination fail, including because there was no infringement of due process in the chief's explanation to the officer about what policies he violated, evidence supporting the violations and why he was being fired instead of receiving less severe discipline, and his opportunity to respond and defend himself against the charges. Affirmed.
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court, Judge: Hagedorn, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2020AP000333, Categories: Employment, due Process, Police Misconduct
J. Bloomekatz finds the lower court properly rejected the police officer's request for qualified immunity on excessive force and deliberate indifference claims filed by the estate. Video evidence and the testimony of other officers clearly indicate the decedent was not a threat at the time he was shot and killed in his home after officers were called there for a well check. The decedent had put his gun on the table at which he was seated and merely leaned toward the ground at the time he was shot; therefore, he did not represent a threat to the officer, while he was also required to do more than simply call paramedics after the shooting, at which time the decedent was hemorrhaging blood and struggling to breathe. Affirmed in part.
Court: 6th Circuit, Judge: Bloomekatz, Filed On: April 29, 2024, Case #: 23-3296, Categories: Civil Rights, Immunity, due Process
J. Huddle finds that the court of appeals properly ruled to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the successors of a property owner whose property was foreclosed upon and the mineral rights were sold to the owner of an oil company. Because the foreclosure of the property occurred over 20 years ago, the statute of limitations on the successors' claim has already expired. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Supreme Court, Judge: Huddle, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 22-0913, Categories: Property, Public Record, due Process
J. Elgo finds that while the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision in a prior case changed the implications of due process claims regarding in-court identifications, the lower court properly dismissed the inmate's habeas claim for ineffective assistance because the prior ruling did not apply retroactively and, therefore, his attorney could not raise the issue on appeal. Affirmed.
Court: Connecticut Court Of Appeals, Judge: Elgo, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: AC46059, Categories: Habeas, due Process, Identification